Compulsory heterosexuality. Lesbian existence. What do these two terms mean?
It was very hard to not Google the meanings of the two, but
I know to get the right answers out of this article I had to refrain. After reading, I am still a little confused
as to what these two words mean. Rich is
a very talented writer, and would be understandable for those who are extremely
into these subjects, or love to read – none of these apply to me.
I thought breaking down the words separately would help give
me a bigger picture of a definition I could come up with myself (I didn’t think
that googling them separately was breaking the rules):
Compulsory: required by rule
Heterosexuality: a sexual attraction to (or sexual relations
with) persons of the opposite sex
Lesbian: a homosexual woman
Existence: the state or fact of existing
(These were all via Siri ;p)
Going by souley on the article I saw:
Compulsory heterosexuality as more of an encouragement for
people who are heterosexual to go into politics and see what the world of law
is doing to them and others. Another
thing that I saw out of the article was that Rich says that this is a mans
world, and a man makes a compulsory heterosexual for his needs. She does speak of how men biologically men have only one
innate orientation--a sexual one that draws them to women--while women have two
innate orientations, sexual toward men and reproductive toward their young. Making women obviously different and more “prone”
to different orientations.
Lesbian existence was broken down into two separate terms in
this article. One: “lesbianism,” and
two: “alternative lifestyle.” It was
very hard for me to tell if Rich was for or against lesbians by the way she
wrote. Once again, she makes lesbian existence about politics and political
rights and wrongs. However, Rich speaks
about lesbian awareness, and about how so many women live in secrets because
they are afraid of who will judge them. Rich
does state that it is a hard world, for everyone.
Question for class:
For Rich, would you say she is for lesbians or completely against them? Where is Rich going with all of this? Is being gay something your born knowing?
Comments:
Want to know where Rich is going with all of her information. I saw a lot of contradictions in her writing.
Question for class:
For Rich, would you say she is for lesbians or completely against them? Where is Rich going with all of this? Is being gay something your born knowing?
Comments:
Want to know where Rich is going with all of her information. I saw a lot of contradictions in her writing.